01
Budget
At the testing stage, an expensive structure does not pay for itself.
The client was launching a first fund and was concerned a Panama vehicle would not pass exchange onboarding. The fund was established in 2–3 weeks. The first exchange account opened a week later. A cost-efficient structure to test the strategy, three exchanges, a bank account and a defined money-flow model.

Trusted by clients and partners across the globe
Client:
First-time fund manager: spot trading on centralised exchanges, futures on Hyperliquid
Situation:
No prior experience running a fund
Challenge:
A structure affordable enough for a test and acceptable to exchanges
Medici Scope:
Fund structuring · Onboarding on three exchanges · Bank account · Sub-accounts · Money-flow design · Investor documents
Jurisdiction:
Panama
Timeline:
Fund: 2–3 weeks · First exchange account: 1 week · Two more: 4 days · [[year]]
Outcome:
An operating fund with a bank account and three exchanges
A thesis to test. A budget that would not support a regulated fund.
The client wanted to test an investment thesis: spot trading on centralised exchanges combined with futures on Hyperliquid.
Several investor types were joining, each in a different share class.
A fully regulated fund would have cost more than the test justified. The client needed a lean structure that still worked with real banks and exchanges.
Cost, exchange acceptance and segregated flows.
01
At the testing stage, an expensive structure does not pay for itself.
01
The client expected Panama funds to face friction in exchange onboarding.
01
Funds from different investors and classes had to be segregated and routed correctly between investors, fund and exchanges.
01
A Private Investment Fund (PIF) set up in Panama.
02
The Bybit account opened within the first week of onboarding.
03
The remaining accounts followed shortly after.
04
Bank account, sub-accounts per share class and a full money-flow model.
05
Templates for investor onboarding, compliance and exits.
One structure had to satisfy investors and exchanges at the same time.
01
In plain terms: a Panama Private Investment Fund serves a limited circle of qualified investors. Setup costs and documentation are lighter than for a regulated European fund, which makes it suitable for testing a strategy.
01
Exchanges assess fund jurisdictions differently. What one compliance team approves in days, another questions for weeks. Knowing each exchange's requirements matters.
01
Share classes require segregated funds, sub-accounts and clear allocation rules.
We addressed the client's main concern first.

01
A first fund needs a structure to test the thesis on, not a costly regulated vehicle.

02
Using Medici's contacts at Binance, Bybit and Deribit [[confirm exchange names]], we carried the onboarding process for the client.

03
Investor → fund → crypto on the exchange → withdrawal to the investor.

04
Investor onboarding, compliance and exit documents for every new investor.
Trading within a month, without overspending on structure.
01
Panama PIF set up in 2–3 weeks, with a full investor document pack.
02
Three exchange accounts and a bank account, with sub-accounts per investor type and share class.
03
The client began trading and testing the thesis about a month after the engagement started. [[confirm time to first trade]]
*Timelines depend on the case and on each exchange's review.
Three points to plan for.

01
It needs one the strategy can be tested on.
01
Each exchange's requirements matter more than the fund's domicile.
01
Investors, fund and exchanges need to be connected in advance.
Tell us where and what you plan to trade. We will propose a structure proportionate to the test.
Discuss Your Case