01
Indicators in the Design
Economic rights resembling profit distribution, an expectation of returns and holder bonuses.
Investors would not join the round while the token appeared to give holders a share of profits. In two weeks we restructured the token as pure utility. A Swiss Legal Opinion, the investment round and listings on three exchanges followed.

Trusted by clients and partners across the globe
Client:
Token issuer / ecosystem project, Swiss SRO member
Situation:
Raising investment and preparing the token launch
Challenge:
Investors' counsel identified the token as a likely security
Medici Scope:
Token classification · Tokenomics and whitepaper · Smart-contract specifications · Legal Opinion coordination
Jurisdiction:
Switzerland (FINMA, SRO), with EU criteria applied
Timeline:
Tokenomics and whitepaper: 2 weeks · Full project: [[timeline]] · [[year]]
Outcome:
Utility classification, Legal Opinion, listing on 3 exchanges
Everything was ready except the classification.
A Swiss company and SRO member was raising capital and preparing to launch a token within its product.
Tokenomics, whitepaper and smart-contract logic were complete. The remaining steps were closing the round and listing, until investors' counsel reviewed the token.
Three security indicators and a fixed deadline.
01
Economic rights resembling profit distribution, an expectation of returns and holder bonuses.
01
Investors would proceed only with a Legal Opinion from a Swiss law firm.
01
Exchanges required a clean classification, and the timeline was tight.
01
Tokenomics, whitepaper and smart-contract logic reviewed for security features.
02
What must be removed, what must change, what can remain.
03
Tokenomics and whitepaper fully reworked.
04
Changes fixed in the technical requirements.
05
Package prepared for Swiss counsel.
06
Security features can sit in the code, not only in the whitepaper.
01
In plain terms: FINMA classifies tokens into three categories.
Payment tokens function as a means of payment.
Utility tokens provide access to a service.
Asset tokens give holders economic rights, such as a share of profits, and are treated much like securities.
01
Any economic right for holders moved this token towards the asset category.
01
In the EU, the boundary is set by MiFID II, not MiCA. A token with revenue share would not be a MiCA crypto-asset; it would be a security.
01
The code matters. Revising the whitepaper is insufficient if the smart contract still distributes profit.
Targeted changes based on the risk map.

01
Only elements flagged by the risk map were changed, which kept a full restructuring within two weeks.

02
Access to services, an internal unit within the product, and incentives through access tiers rather than returns.
Revenue share and fee distribution → removed. Passive returns → access tiers.

03
Moved to an access and loyalty model, keeping engagement without yield-product features.

04
No dividends, no centralised issuance, no profit-sharing.
Centralised issuance → excluded in the smart-contract specifications.
Utility classification, Legal Opinion, listing on 3 exchanges
01
A Swiss law firm confirmed the token is a utility token and not subject to securities regulation.
02
New tokenomics, whitepaper and smart-contract specifications without security features.
03
The investment round proceeded and the token listed on Bitget, Gate.io and KuCoin. [[confirm exchange names can be used]]
Three points to check early.

01
Their conclusion can block a round just as effectively.
01
Not only in the whitepaper.
01
It can move from a yield model to an access model.
Send us the tokenomics or whitepaper. We will map the risks and define what needs to change.
Discuss Your Case